Conflict management in organizations: A systematic review
Abstract views: 64
/ 
PDF downloads: 28
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17143170Keywords:
Organizational conflict, education, school management, systematic reviewAbstract
The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature on conflict management in organizations in Turkey between 2005 and 2025, a period chosen because the full texts of one study from 2003 and another from 2004 were unavailable, resulting in their exclusion from the analysis. This study is a systematic review. The document analysis method was used as the data collection technique. Among the purposive sampling methods, the criterion sampling technique was preferred. In line with the aim of the research, articles published in Turkey between 2005 and 2025 and included in the TR Index database on the topic of conflict management in organizations were systematically examined. The population of the study consists of a total of 65 articles found in TR Index. The study reached the full count of these articles. The findings of the study indicate that the number of studies on conflict management in organizations have increased over the years, with the highest number of publications occurring particularly in and after 2020. The most frequently addressed topics in the examined articles were "conflict and its management" and "school climate." The most cited article received 25 citations. Quantitative studies were more numerous than qualitative and mixed-method studies. Based on these findings, it is expected that the topic of conflict management in organizations will continue to maintain its importance in the future.
References
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
Boulding, K. E. (1962). Conflict and defense: A general theory. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Budd, J. W., & Colvin, A. J. S. (2014). The goals and assumptions of conflict management in organizations. In W. K. Roche, P. Teague, & A. J. S. Colvin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of conflict management in organizations (pp. 12–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (29. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Araştırma tasarımı. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Follett, M. P. (1940). Constructive conflict. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 30–49). New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1926)
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Diego, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Gökçek, T., Babacan, Z. F., Kangal, E., Çakır, N., & Kül, Y. (2013). 2003–2012 yılları arasında Türkiye’de karma araştırma yöntemiyle yapılan eğitim çalışmalarının analizi [Analysis of the education studies conducted with mixed method research in Turkey between 2003–2012 years]. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(6), 435–456.
Guba, E. G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17–30). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gunbayi, I. (2023). Data analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7763207
Gunbayi, I., & Sorm, S. (2018). Social paradigms in guiding social research design: The functional, interpretive, radical humanist and radical structural paradigms. Journal of Mixed Methods Studies, 9(2), 57–76.
Gunbayi, I., & Sorm, S. (2020). Social paradigms in guiding management social development and social research. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Günbayı, İ., & Karahan, İ. (2006). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin kurum içi çatışmaları yönetim biçemleri [Compulsory school teachers’ conflict management styles in school]. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 209–230.
Hasson, R. (2006). How to resolve board disputes more effectively. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(1), 77–80.
Karaçam, Z. (2013). Sistematik derleme metodolojisi: Sistematik derleme hazırlamak için bir rehber [Systematic review methodology: A guide to preparing a systematic review]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 6(1), 26–33.
Kıral, B., & Kıral, E. (2011). Karma araştırma yöntemi [Mixed methods]. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (pp. 294–298). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi. Retrieved from http://www.iconte.org/FileUpload/ks59689/File/050.pdf
Lapa, T. Y., Köse, E., & Günbayı, İ. (2018). Türkiye’de yapılan rekreasyon araştırmaları: Sistematik bir derleme [Recreation studies in Turkey: A systematic review]. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(2), 87–102.
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Luecke, R. A., & Patterson, J. G. (2008). How to become a better negotiator. New York, NY: AMACOM.
Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Murphy, J., Vriesenga, M., & Storey, V. (2007). Educational Administration Quarterly, 1979–2003: An analysis of types of work, methods of investigation, and influences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 612–628.
Neuman, W. L. (2009). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474–498. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR11-3/onwuegbuzie.pdf
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Prein, H. C. M. (1976). Stijlen van conflicthantering [Styles of handling conflict]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 31, 321–346.
Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376.
Rahim, M. A. (2023). Managing conflict in organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.
Rahim, M. A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports, 44(3), 1323–1344.
Raines, S. S. (2013). Conflict management for managers: Resolving workplace, client, and policy disputes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Rallis, S. F., & Rossman, G. B. (2003). Mixed methods in evaluation contexts: A pragmatic framework. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 491–512). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ruble, T. L., & Thomas, K. W. (1976). Support for a two-dimensional model for conflict behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1), 143–155.
Sığrı, Ü. (2018). Müzakere [Negotiation]. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
Stewart, S. (1998). Conflict resolution: A foundation guide (Vol. 1). Winchester: Waterside Press.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 889–935). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Van de Vliert, E., & Kabanoff, B. (1990). Toward theory-based measures of conflict management. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 199–209.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 