Rigor in qualitative research
Abstract views: 87
/ 
PDF downloads: 51
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13256320%20Keywords:
rigor, qualiatative research, credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmabilityAbstract
Numerous studies have been published on the rigor of qualitative research, presenting both shared and differing concepts, definitions, and approaches. In this editorial on rigor in qualitative research, the author aims to clarify these concepts by drawing on literature, mainly from Guba (1981) and Lincoln & Guba (1985), as well as his own research experiences, providing examples to illustrate key points.
References
Cohen, L., Mannion, L. & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Duzguncinar, T., & Gunbayi, I . (2020). Occupational analysis with DACUM: A case study. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(2), 714-736.
Gold, R. (1997). The ethnographic method in sociology. Qualitative Enquiry, 3, 4, 387-402.
Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., Eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks,105-117.
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75-92.
Gunbayi I. (2023). Data Analysis in Qualitative Research. Journal Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research, Volume 2 (Issue 2),1-11.
Gunbayi, I. (2020a). Knowledge-constitutive interests and social paradigms in guiding mixed methods research (MMR). Journal of Mixed Methods Studies, (1), 44-56.
Gunbayi, I. (2020b). Systematic curriculum and instructional development for mixed methods research: SCID-MMR. Journal of Mixed Methods Studies, Issue 1, 1-27.
Gunbayi I. (2019). Developing a qualitative research manuscript based on systematic curriculum and instructional development. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 3, 3, 124-153.
Gunbayi, I. (2014). Job stressors and their effects on academic staff: A case study. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5, 4, 58-73
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Öz, G. Ö., Çakmak, N. C. S. & Gunbayi̇, I. (2024). “I want to have stories too”. Nursing students' views on nursing identity and reasons for choosing nursing as a career: A qualitative study, Nurse Education in Practice, 78, 1-7.
Özparlak, A., Karakaya, D., Önder, A., & Gunbayı, I. (2023). Problematic internet use in adolescents: A phenomenological study. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 30, 731–742.
Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. (Vol.2). Sage: Los Angeles, pp. 697-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
