Applying socio-ecological perspectives semantic networks in managing community conservation areas in Ghana

Abstract views: 221 / PDF downloads: 90


  • Nana Owusu-Ansah Forestry Commission Training Centre, Post Office Box KS 6424, Kumasi



CREMA, phenomenological studies, semantic networks, sustainability


This study purpose was to identify key nature conservation themes and their semantic interrelationships that could be considered in the establishment and management of Community Resource Management Areas (CREMAs) in Ghana. A qualitative descriptive phenomenological approach was used to interview nine CREMA leaders from three different locations in northern Ghana. Seventeen major socio-ecological themes were identified under three nature conservation domains of: 1) conservation objectives, 2) risk management and 3) sustainable economic opportunities. Three semantic networks were developed under the central domains where the 17 themes served as labelled nodes interlinked with seven labelled links of: 1) is part of, 2) is associated with, 3) promotes, 4) produces, 5) is cause of, 6) is property of, and 7) contradicts. The study findings indicate that there are intricate interrelated socio-ecological issues that CREMA managers should understand and appreciate to attain sustainable benefits. The application of livelihood incentives, creating awareness and law enforcement are key activities managers must implement together with others to achieve sustainable benefits in the CREMAs.


Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of

communities in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629-649.

Agyare, A. K. (2013). Polycentric governance and social-ecological performance of community

resource management areas in Ghana [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Victoria.

Asare, R. A., Kyei, A., & Mason, J. J. (2013). The community resource management area

mechanism: A strategy to manage African forest resources for REDD. Philosophical Transaction of Royal Society, 368.

Bandoh, G. A. A. (2010). Conservation and natural resource management in the Ankasa

Resource Reserve, Ghana [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Waterloo.

Bixler, R. P., Dell’Angelo, J., Mfune, O., & Roba, H. (2015). The political ecology of

participatory conservation: Institutions and discourse. Journal of Political Ecology, 22, 164-182.

Boyd, C. O. (2001). Phenomenology the method. In P. L. Munhall (Ed.), Nursing research: A

qualitative perspective (3rd ed., pp. 93-122).

Braun V., & Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in

Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Brooks, J., Waylen, K. A., & Mulder, M. B. (2013). Assessing community-based conservation

projects: A systematic review and multilevel analysis of attitudinal, behavioral, ecological and economic outcomes. Environmental Evidence, 2(2). doi:10.1186/2047-2382-2-2

Conley, A., & Moote, A. (2001). Collaborative conservation in theory and practice: A literature

review. Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona.

Conte, R., Gilbert, N., Bonelli, G., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Deffuant, G., Kertesz, J., et al. (2012).

Manifesto of computational social science. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 325-346.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five

traditions. Sage.

Downing, M. J. (2008). Why video? How technology advances method. The Qualitative

Report, 13(2), 173-177.

Drexhage, J., & Murphy, D. (2010). Sustainable development from Brundtland to Rio

Background Paper for Global Sustainability Meeting. New York, United Nations.

Ekpe, E. K., Hinkle, C. R., Quigley, M. F., & Owusu, H. E. (2014). Natural resource and

biodiversity conservation in Ghana: The use of livelihoods support activities to achieve conservation objectives. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 10(4), 253-261. doi:10.1080/21513732.2014.971056

Ferrer i Cancho, R., & Solé, R. V. (2001). The small world of human language. Proceedings of

the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268(1482), 2261-2265.

Finlay, L. (2009). Debating phenomenological research methods. Phenomenology & Practice,

(1), 6-25.

Game, E. T., Fitzsimons, J. A., Lipsett-Moore, G., & McDonald-Madden, E. (2013). Subjective

risk assessment for planning conservation projects. Environment Research Letters, 8.


Geldmann, J., Monica, A., Burgess, N.D., Coad, L., & Balmford, A. (2019). A global-level

assessment of effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. PNAS 116(46).

Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal

of Qualitative Methods, 3(1).

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and

organizations across nations. Sage.

Jones, T. B., & Erdmann, K. T. (2013). Community-based natural resource management in

Southern Africa: A decision makers-guide. USAID.

Joseph, L. N., Maloney, F. R., & Possingham, H. P. (2008). Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: A project prioritization protocol. Conservation Biology.

doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01124.x

Kafla, N. P. (2011). Hermeneutic phenomenological research method simplified.

Bodhi: An International Journal, 5. Kathmandu University, Nepal.

King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 257-270). Sage.

Kopnina, H. (2012). Toward conservational anthropology: Addressing anthropocentric bias in

anthropology. Dialectical Anthropology, 36, 127-146. doi:10.1007/s10624-012-9265-y

Kotey, E. N. A., Francois, J., Owusu, J. G. K., Yeboah, R., Amanor, K. S., & Antwi, L. (1998).

Falling into place: Policy that works for forests and people. International Institute for Environment and Development.

Laube, W. (2015). Global Shea nut commodity chains and poverty eradication in

northern Ghana. UDS International Journal of Development [UDSIJD], 2(1).

Laverty, S. M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of

historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 1-29.

Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R. (2010). Governance

principles for natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 23(10), 986-1001.

Majumder, J., & Khanra, S. (2015). An overview of semantic networks and its components. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 3(18).

McDougal, D. (2010). Sustainability: Embodying an ecological worldview. Kairos. SustainabilityEcologicalWorldview.pdf

Moore, S. (2008). The role of Vitellaria Paradoxa in poverty reduction and food security in the

Upper East region of Ghana. Earth & Environment, 3, 209-245.

Osorio-Forero, A., Caicedo-Mera, J., Valencia, S., Agudelo-Ortiz, D., Rincón-Mendieta, C., Aponte, D., & Martínez-Cotrina, J. (2019). On the architecture of semantic networks: A

quantitative assessment of subjective representations. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 7(4), 33-45.

Owusu-Ansah, N. (2020). Leading sustainability: Understanding leadership emergence in

community resources management areas in Ghana. The Qualitative Report, 25(7), 1766-1779.

Owusu-Ansah, N. (2021). Identifying the dominant ecological worldviews of community leaders

and the influences these have on managing conservation areas in Ghana. Journal of Management for Global Sustainability, 9(1). doi: 10.13185/JM2021.09104

Rodrigues, E., & Pietrocola, M., (2020). Between social and semantic networks: A case study

on classroom complexity. Education Science, 10(30). doi:10.3390/educsci10020030

Roe, D., Nelson, F., & Sandbrook, C. (Eds.). (2009). Community management of natural in

Africa: Impacts, experiences and future directions. Natural Resource Issues No. 18. International Institute for Environment and Development.

Sarkar, S., Moffett, A., Sierra, R., Fuller, T., Cameron, S., & Garson, J. (2004). Incorporating

multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks. Endangered Species UPDATE, 21(3), 100-107.

Shafer, C. L. (2015). Cautionary thoughts on IUCN protected area management categories V-VI.

Global Ecology & Conservation, 3, 331-348. http://

Sloan, A., & Bowe, B. (2014). Phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenology: The

philosophy, the methodologies and using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate lecturers' experiences of curriculum design. Quality & Quantity, 48(3), 1291-1303.

Stevens, R. D., & Tello, J. S. (2011). Diversity begets diversity: Relative roles of

structural and resource heterogeneity in determining rodent community structure. Journal of Mammalogy, 92(2), 387–395. doi: 10.1644/10-MAMM-A-117.1

Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks:

Statistical analysis and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science 29, 41-78.

Vining, J., Merrick, M. S., & Price, E. A. (2008). The Distinction between humans and nature:

Human perceptions of connectedness to nature and elements of the natural and unnatural. Human Ecology Review, 15(1), 1-11.




How to Cite

Owusu-Ansah, N. (2024). Applying socio-ecological perspectives semantic networks in managing community conservation areas in Ghana. Journal of Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research, 3(1), 1–20.